A Forensic Linguistics Analysis of Senate Investigations on the Matter of People’s Initiative in the Philippines: Language Crimes in Focus

Authors

  • Brandon N. Obenza University of Mindanao, Davao City, 8000, Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-1782
  • Chryzl Joy O. Deluao Barayong National High School , Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v4i1.4010

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Language Crime, People’s Initiative, Philippines, Violations of Maxims

Abstract

This critical discourse analysis aims to expose the violations of the standards and guidelines of conversation specifically in the context of senate investigations on the matter of People’s Initiative in the Philippines. Moreover, this study delved into the violations of maxims within the premise of cooperative principle conceptualized by Grice. This study utilized a qualitative research design using forensic linguistics through critical discourse analysis, with corpus linguistics of two 4-hour length senate investigation videos which focus on spoken legal language. The findings revealed the frequency of violations of the four maxims within the analyzed corpora as follows: 23% on the maxim of quality, 23% on the maxim of quantity, 34% on the maxim of relevance, and 20% on the maxim of manner. This finding signifies the complexities of linguistic behavior within the analyzed corpora and offers insights into the discourse surrounding People’s Initiative in the Philippines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zubeiry, H. Y. A. (2020). Violation of Grice’s maxims and humorous implicatures in the Arabic comedy Madraset Al-Mushaghbeen. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759363

Awwad, A. S., Ayasreh, A. M., Ayasrah, N. M., & AL-Sabti, N. (2019). Interpretations of the Gricean conversational maxims violations. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(22), 4100-4104. Research India Publications. Retrieved from http://www.ripublication.com

Birkland, T. A. (2016). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public policy making (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Ceballos, C. T., & Sosas, R. V. (2018). On court proceedings: A forensic linguistic analysis on maxim violation. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 3(2), 17-31 http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol3iss2pp17-3

Christhoffer, D. (2005). The shameless liar guide’s. Sourcebooks Hysteria Coulthard, M., Grant, T., & Kredens. (2010). Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences: Law Forensic Linguistics. In B. Johnstone, R. Wodak, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cruz, J. A. F. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis and criminology: An interdisciplinary approach. Politica Criminal, 8, 472-499.

Decker, J. F. (2004). The varying parameters of obstruction of justice in american criminal law. La. L. Rev., 65, 49.

Deimer, D., & Feddersen, T. (2000). Information and congressional hearings. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 51–65.

Dewan, M. (2023). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Significant Tool in Literature Teaching. Politica Criminal, 1, 70-78.

Dewi, R., & La’biran, R. (2023). Language Crime by Students in the Communication Process on Campus. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7, 928-941. http://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.4.928-941

Dewi, R., & Rukuk, S. (2022). Violations of Language in Learning Process at Toraja Christian University of Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan,14(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1111

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (3, Speech acts). New York: Academic P.

Hassan, J. (2020). Forensic Linguistics: A Study in Criminal Speech Acts. Beni- Suef University International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 39-65. http://doi.org/10.21608/buijhs.2020.91333

Hemel, D., & Posner, E. (2018). Presidential Obstruction of Justice. 106 California Law Review, 1277.

Herwin, H., Mahmudah, M., & Saleh, S. (2021). Analysis of Language Crimes on Social Media (Forensic Linguistics). Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v17i2.4431

Hidayati, H., & Lukman, L. (2019). A Conversational Analysis of Grice’s Maxims Theories on Cooperative Principles at Undergraduate English Students.Linguistics and ELT Journal, 11(5). http://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v11i1.742

La’biran, R., Dewi, R., Muthmainnah, M., & Hasby, M. (2019). The Students’ Attitude Towards The Use of Interactive Classroom Activities in Developing The Communicative Competence of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Kristen Barana. Pepatudzu: Educational and Social Community Media, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.35329/fkip.v14i2.199

Mentari, A. (2018). The Maxim Violations of Barack Obama’s Utterance in Interview with Claus Kleber about Spy Intelligence. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/65352/1

Obenza, B. N., Caloc, L. J. R., & Baradillo, D. G. (2024). A Political Discourse Analysis of the Philippine Politicians’ speech acts on People’s Initiative: A Forensic Linguistics study. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 2(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i2.559

Obenza, B. & Baradillo, D. (2023). A Sentiment Analysis on the Resumption of ICC Investigation on the Philippine Drug War. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 5(11), 16–28. Research Parks Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10171328

Perna, L. W., Orosz, K., & Kent, D. C. (2019). The Role and Contribution of Academic Researchers in Congressional Hearings: A Critical Discourse Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 111-145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218788824

Poggi, F. (2020). Against the conversational model of legal interpretation: On the difference between legislative intent and speaker’s intention. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, 40, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.5694

Ramdan, A. H. (n.d.). Implicature of the utterances at court: A pragmatics study. English Journal Literacy Utama, 2(2), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol4.iss1.2020.390

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2017). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies.

Shambayati, H. (1375/1997). Crimes against Possession. Tehran: Vistar Publication.

Shardimgaliev, M. (2019). Implicatures in Judicial Opinions. International Journal of Semiotics and Law, 32(3), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018- 09601-4

Tiersma, P., & Solan, L. (2012). The Language of Crime. Oxford University Press.

Warami, H. (2021). Language Crimes on Social Media in the Legal Area of Manokwari: A Forensic Linguistics Study. International Journal of Forensic, 2(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

A Forensic Linguistics Analysis of Senate Investigations on the Matter of People’s Initiative in the Philippines: Language Crimes in Focus. (2025). American Journal of Society and Law, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v4i1.4010

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.